Server virtualization through various hypervisor technologies is prevalent in every data center I visit. There may be one out there somewhere not virtualizing servers, but I haven't seen it. The efficiencies are just too magnificent to pass up. Power, cooling, cash, personnel, and floor space all make the list of significant cost savings gained through server virtualization.
What about storage virtualization? Will you get the same economies virtualizing storage as servers? Let's examine a few fundamentals first. Virtualizing a server essentially means running multiple virtual servers on one physical server, presumably with each one performing different functions. However, with storage, we're already doing that. We take our storage subsystem, carve it up into pieces (LUNs, for example) and give it to servers for various uses. So what is storage virtualization? My own simple definition is this: If you can manage and provision all of your individual storage systems (Sun, EMC, IBM, HDS, etc.) from one “pane of glass,” and seamlessly move your data between different systems, then it’s virtualized. I found a fancier definition on Tech Target, which reads: “Virtualization is the pooling of physical storage from multiple network storage devices into what appears to be a single storage device that is managed from a central console.”
I believe there's a consensus that storage is next realm of the data center to make the virtualization jump. Many vendors are starting to offer storage virtualization solutions. FalconStor is working with VMware to combine the virtual server and virtual storage worlds (read http://www.falconstor.com/en/pages/?pn=VMware). If you need to move data from one array to another, that is a simple task in the virtual environment. Storage administrators now have the option of provisioning storage from a pool of storage types, offering the right type of storage to the right applications.
In a virtual storage environment, data protection becomes a simple task. Most storage virtualization vendors provide functionality for in-system replication (snapshots), replication (e.g., for disaster recovery), and thin provisioning, within their core virtualization platform.
Using FalconStor again as an example, their Network Storage Server (NSS) product provides a virtual storage environment, thin provisioning, and DR replication in a single, low-cost appliance. This functionality not only simplifies storage management, it creates huge potential cost savings. Because it over-rides and extends the functionality of your storage vendor’s proprietary management software, you no longer need to pay for ongoing licensing and support costs. If you've got a heterogeneous storage environment – and multiple sites – the savings just multiply.
I believe as more IT professionals realize the cost savings, flexibility, and ease of management of virtualized storage, it will become the next hot trend in moving towards a completely virtualized data center.
If you'd like to understand how you can benefit from storage virtualization, click here and request a no-obligation (free) white-board assessment session.